DHRUV RAJ YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9260/2025 · 2025-11-13
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174646 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174646 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9260 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant for quashing cognizance order dated 26.05.2025 passed in Criminal Case No. 5485 of 2023 pursuant to chargesheet no. 198C of 2025 dated 11.05.2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 310 of 2021 under Sections 307, 342, 323, 325, 308, 504, 506, 120-B IPC and Section 7 C.L.A. Act, Police Station Gauriganj, District Amethi by learned FTC/SD, District Sultanpur, including entire proceedings of aforesaid case.
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicant is permitted to move his discharge application(s) within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) is/are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishna Gopal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dhruv Raj Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
of a reasoned and speaking order.
6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.
7. In case of failure on the part of applicant in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, he will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.
8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. November 13, 2025 Raj A482 No. 9260 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench