HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9070 of 2025 Court No. - 28 HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Sri Ashutosh, Advocate has put in appearance by way of filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Sri Ashutosh, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 as well as perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed for quashing of the chargesheet dated 05.07.2013 filed in Case No. 2185 of 2013; State of U.P. Vs. Naqi Hussain @ Amit, arising out of Case Crime No. 209 of 2013, under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Chowk, District Lucknow and summoning order dated 26.10.2013 passed by ACJM, CBI(AP), Lucknow as well as entire proceedings in pursuance thereof, on the basis of compromise dated 23.05.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant FIR was lodged against the applicant. He added that later on, the parties sat together and have amicably settled their disputes, which has been reduced in writing. Thereafter, the applicant filed an Application U/s 482 No. 6790 of 2025, wherein this Court vide order dated 20.08.2025 had directed the court below to verify the said compromise deed and in compliance thereof, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yashab Husain Rizvi, Arif Hussain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Naqi Hussain @ Amit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) compromise deed was verified on 23.09.2025. He submits that now there is no dispute in between the parties and they have settled their dispute. He submits that further criminal proceedings in the instant matter would amount to harassment and, thus, the instant criminal proceedings against the applicant may be quashed. Learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2 has also supported the version of learned counsel for the applicant and submits that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the opposite party no. 2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicant may be dropped. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submissions aforesaid. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 23.05.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 23.09.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal proceedings against the applicant. In view of the above, as the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise on 23.05.2025 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgments of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003) 4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2008) 9 SCC 677; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others, (2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466. Resultantly, the proceedings of Case No. 2185 of 2013; State of U.P. Vs. Naqi Hussain @ Amit, arising out of Case Crime No. 209 of 2013, under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Chowk, District Lucknow, are hereby quashed. The compromise deed shall be part of this order. Consequences to be followed. A482 No. 9070 of 2025 2 The present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed accordingly. October 30, 2025 kkv/ A482 No. 9070 of 2025 3 (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench