HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11617 of 2025 Court No. - 22 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The instant petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned ex parte order dated 13.6.2025 passed in Revision No. 3230 of 2024, computerized no. C- 202404000003230, under Sections 219 of LR Act, and a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the stay vacation application dated 13.11.2025 in a time bound manner. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that against the order dated 16.11.2024 passed by the S.D.M., a revision was filed by respondents No. 2, 3 & 4 before the Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya on 3.12.2024. Though the petitioner had already filed a caveat on 3.12.2024, notice of revision was not given to him and the ex parte order was passed on 13.6.2025 by the revenue court. However, immediately after knowledge of the said ex parte interim order dated 13.6.2025, the petitioner filed a recall application on 13.11.2025 which is still pending. It is further submitted that once a caveat had been filed, it was was incumbent upon the revisional court to give opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing any order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Kanti Mishra @ Raj Kumari .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) 4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to decide the objection of the petitioner dated 13.11.2025 filed against ex parte order dated 13.6.2025 on the next date fixed i.e. 17.12.2025. December 3, 2025 Vandana WRIC No. 11617 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench