Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174635 (ALL)

ADITYA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/10510/2025 · 2025-10-30

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10510 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 0039 of 2025, under Sections 85, 80(2), B.N.S., and Section 3/4, Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Sohramau, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in the same F.I.R. father- in-law and mother-in-law have been enlarged on bail. The applicant is the husband and nothing specific has been attributed to the applicant. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the postmortem report, which demonstrates the cause of death as 'antemortem hanging' and there is nothing specific against the applicant of having caused mental or physical harassment to the deceased soon before her death in relation to demand of dowry, the applicant who is in custody since 15.03.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, without commenting upon the merits of the case, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Aditya Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aditya Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 30, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 10510 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench