NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO
BAIL/10235/2025 · 2025-11-06
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174621 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174621 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10235 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.486 of 2009, under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Khairabad, District Sitapur.
3. In terms of the FIR lodged in the year 2009, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was went missing. Subsequently, her body was found. It was also alleged that the informant wanted to marry the deceased but the applicant was not permitting her to marry because of which, some poison was administered. In the said FIR, final report was filed, against which, a protest petition was filed which has been entertained and the applicant has been summoned.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the incident is of the year 2009 and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 27.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Neeraj Kumar be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pankaj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Neeraj Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 6, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10235 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench