SHAILENDRAKUMAR HIRALALSA UGHADMATHE v. RUPANJALI SHAILENDRAKUMAR UGHADMATHE
WP/6842/2024 · 2025-02-26
Shri R M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17462 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17462 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
922-WP-6842-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6842 OF 2024 Shailendrakumar Hiralalsa Ughadmathe VERSUS Rupanjali Shailendrakumar Ughadmathe *** • Mr. R. K. Khandelwal, Advocate for the Petitioner • Mr. R. N. Chavan, Advocate for the Respondent ***
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2025 PER COURT :
1.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, makes statement that original proceeding in which order impugned is passed is dismissed for want of prosecution. Though he makes statement that the steps would be taken by the Petitioner to restore the proceedings, on instruction, he seeks withdrawal of the Petition since it has been already dismissed.
2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn being infructuous.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.) Umesh PAGE 1 OF 1 2025:BHC-AUG:5383