Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17461 (PNJ)

RAMAN KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/2042/2025 · 2025-01-27

Deepak Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 131 CWP-2042-2025 Date of Decision.:27.01.2025 Raman Kumar Pe--oner Vs. State of Punjab and Others Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Manu K. Bhandari, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Kataria, Advocate for the peoner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of this peon filed under Arcle 226 of the Constuon of India, peoner prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus direcng the respondents authories to grant arrears of pay to the peoner on account of implementaon of 6th Pay Commission along with interest @ 18% per annum. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the peoner that in terms of the order dated 16.08.2019 passed by this Court, the services of the peoner were regularized with effect from 03.09.2011 and by virtue of that, peoner became entled to the benefit of ACP on compleon of 04 years and 09 years of service. However these benefits have not been granted to him. He also served a jusce demand noce dated 20.06.2023 (Annexure P- 11) but the same has not been responded ll date. It is also inter alia contended that similarly situated employees have already been granted the benefit of 06th Pay Commission. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the peoner submits that he will be sasfied if his legal noce dated 20.06.2023 (Annexure P-11) is considered and decided by passing a speaking order in the me bound manner. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.01.27 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-2042-2025 -2- 4. Noce of moon. 5. Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Addional AG, Punjab accepts noce on behalf of the respondents and submits that he has no objecon to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the peoner. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the pares and have gone through the record of the case. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the peoner in the present peon, respondents are directed to consider the grievances put forth by the peoner in legal noce dated 20.06.2023 (Annexure P-11), in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of cerfied copy of this order. 8. The peon stands disposed of. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE January 27, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.01.27 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document