HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10027 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Sri Ravi Kant, Advocate, has put in appearance for the private opposite party No. 2 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):- "Wherefore, it is humbly prayed that the Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Impugned charge sheet as well as Case No- 0034191 of 2016, (State Vs Akil Khan) arising out of Case Crime No 274 of 2015, Under Section Police Station 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C, Lucknow, Uttar Talkatora, District Pradesh, Pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, III Lucknow on the basis of compromise dated 6.11.25 contained in annexure no.4 to this petition. It is also prayed that during the pendency of the instant petition under 482 Cr.P.C/528 BNSS, the further proceedings of Case No-0034191 of 2016, (State Vs Akil Khan) arising out of Case Crime No - 274 of 2015, Under Section 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C, Police Station Talkatora, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, Pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, III Lucknow, may kindly be stayed." 4. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 4 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayank Pandey, Akhilesha Nand Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akil Khan @ Tillu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned court within four week's from today. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. November 28, 2025 Arun/- A482 No. 10027 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench