Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174604 (ALL)

SMT. KAHKASHAN SIDDIUQI v. ADDL. JUDGE SMALL CAUSES COURT II COURT NO. 19 LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A227/6873/2025 · 2025-11-25

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6873 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private- respondents is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the application purportedly filed by the petitioner under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC which was filed by the petitioner on 21.03.2025. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending application under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC filed by the petitioner on 21.03.2025 most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible. 5. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the Court concerned shall consider and decide the aforesaid application of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. November 25, 2025 Rakesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S.Mohd Kazim, Pramod Kumar, Syed Athar Moghani, Syed Jamal Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Smt. Kahkashan Siddiuqi .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Judge Small Causes Court Ii Court No. 19 Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench