Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17460 (UTT)

HAYAT SINGH PARIHAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1787/2025 · 2025-12-17

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:11307 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS/ 1 7 8 7 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J 1. Mr. S. Chand, Advocate holding brief of Mr. D.K. Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 submits that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the said submission. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J) 17.12.2025 Aswal 2025:UHC:11307