APHC010237022025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12467/2025 Between: Boya Mulinti Bheemesh and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAMESH N Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12467/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not issuing the Pattadar Pass Book to the 2nd petitioner in respect of in an extent of Ac.0.34 cents in Sy.No.11-2C1, Ac.0.80 cents in Sy.No.11-2C3, Ac.3.79 cents in Sy.No.11-2C5 and Ac.0.33 cents in Sy.No.23-1 total outcome an extent of Ac.5.26 cents of Gorantia Village, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District is as illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and violative of principal of natural justice apart violative of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue the Pattadar Pass Book in respect of in an extent Ac.0.34 cents in Sy.No.11-2C1, Ac.0.80 cents in Sy.No.11-2C3, Ac.3.79 cents in Sy.No.11-2C5 and Ac.0.33 cents in Sy.No.23-1 total outcome an extent of Ac.5.26 cents of Gorantia Village, Kodumuru Mandal, Kurnool District and pass such other order.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioners made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the 6-A application submitted by the petitioners through online. 3 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the 6-A application, if any pending with the respondents. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioners himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the 6-A application, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the 6-A application filed by the petitioners, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of three(3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 1 2019 (8) SCALE 544 4 As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 08.05.2025 TTPPSS 5 20 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12467/2025 08.05.2025 TTPPSS