Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174583 (ALL)

AFAQ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

/11454/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11454 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.318 of 2024 under section 103(1) and 238(B) BNS, P.S. Jankipuram, District Lucknow. 3. It is argued that the co-accused with similar allegations was enlarged on bail vide order dated 13.11.2025. 4. As the allegations are similar and the applicant has no criminal history, on the ground of parity, the applicant is also entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Afaq be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Uma Kant Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Afaq .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 26, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11454 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench