Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174580 (ALL)

SARVESH VERMA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS HOME SECY. ANNEXE BHAWAN LKO. AND ANOTHER

/2159/2025 · 2025-12-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2159 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Sri Sartaj Ali Ansari, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No.2 and has filed Vakalatnama which is taken on record. 3. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed to quash the entire proceeding of arising out of Case No. 105651 of 2025 (State Vs. Sarvesh Verma and others) pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-4, Lucknow along with charge-sheet No. 01 dated 21.05.2022 under Sections 498-A, 323, 506, 504 I.P.C. read with Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No. 33 of 2025, Police Station-Vikas Nagar, District-Lucknow and summoning order date 02.08.2025 on the basis of compromise dated 15.11.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that now parties have entered into compromise, therefore, this Court may please to quash the proceeding for which Sri Sartaj Ali Ansari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has no objection. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Paritosh Sharan Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sarvesh Verma And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Home Secy. Annexe Bhawan Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it within two weeks, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within two weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, proceeding of arising out of Case No. 105651 of 2025 (State Vs. Sarvesh Verma and others) pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-4, Lucknow, shall remain stayed. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 16, 2025 Karan NA528 No. 2159 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench