HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10563 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. 1. Sri Lucky Sonkar, Advocate, put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 2 and filed vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Lucky Sonkar, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed with prayer to quash entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 123250 of 2022(State of U.P. Vs. Jai Singh and another), arising out of Case Crime No. 0103 of 2022, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Aminabad, District Lucknow in terms of compromise dated 10.04.2023, verified by A.C.J.M. IInd Room No. 26, Lucknow vide its order dated 18.05.2023. 4. Earlier, the applicants approached this Court by filing Application U/S 482 No. 4023 of 2023, which was disposed of vide order dated 25.04.2023 with direction to Trial Court to verify the compromise entered between the parties and submit report. 5. In light of order of this Court dated 25.04.2023 passed in Application U/S 482 No. 4023 of 2023, compromise has been verified by the Trial Court vide order dated 18.05.2023, which has also been annexed as Anneure No.2 to this application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhupendra Nath Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jai Singh Sonkar And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Sri Lucky Sonkar, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 submitted that in case proceedings against the applicants is quashed, he would have no objection. 7. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party No. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matters of Krishnappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka; 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 529, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat and another; 2017 9 SCC 641, B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana; 2003(4) SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Burea of Investigation and another; (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 677, Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab; (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another; (2014) Supreme Today 642, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed. 9. The present application is, accordingly allowed. December 17, 2025 ADY A482 No. 10563 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench