HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1001991 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. List has been revised. None for the petitioner. Sri Divesh Mishra, learned Standing Counsel is present. 2. In view of the above, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Interim order, if any, is vacated. November 26, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.N.Gupta, Tushar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Irshad Ali,J.) Shiv Ram U.P.Z.A. .....Petitioner(s) The Additional Commissioner Lucknow And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench