MAIKU LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/11170/2025 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174531 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174531 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11170 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.198 of 2025, under sections 121(1), 121(2), 132, 125(B), 221, 115(2), 352, 351(3), (3)(5) BNS, Section 7 C.L.A. Act, P.S. Subeha, District Barabanki.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on account of petty dispute accused named in the FIR started hitting with ladhi, danda etc and when police tried to intervene they also attacked them which resulted in substantial injuries. Injuries report on record does not indicate any substantial injury. No specific allegations were levelled against the applicant. No recovery was also effected from the applicant. The applicant was not even named in the FIR.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 31.8.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Maiku Lal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sarjoo Ram, Aklavya, Mamta Rawat, Mohan Lal Maurya, Rachna Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Maiku Lal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11170 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench