RAJENDRA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1133/2025 · 2025-02-27
Deepak Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17452 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17452 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:28318 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1133 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajendra Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Girja Shanker Sen,Krishna Dutt Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
1. Heard Sri G. S. Sen, learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in Case Crime No.211 of 2018 (Criminal Case No.1536 of 2019), under Sections. 420, 406 IPC, Police Station-Civil Line, District- Rampur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. No offence under the alleged sections is made out against the applicant. It is civil nature dispute. I.O. has submitted charge sheet in the year 2019 and court concerned has issued summon against the applicants on 30.09.2019 and since last five years, applicant has not received summon and he had no knowledge regarding summon issued by the trial court. After getting informant regarding issuance of summon, applicant immediately filed this anticipatory bail application. In case, the applicants are released on bail, they would not misuse the liberty of bail and would co-operate in trial proceedings. Applicants have definite apprehension of their arrest by the police. 4. Learned A.G.A. raised objection for prayer of anticipatory bail of the applicants and submitted that I.O. has submitted charge sheet against the applicants in the year 2019 and bailable warrant has also issued against the applicants but applicants did not approached to the court below for further proceedings, as such, prima facie, offence is made out against the applicants. 5. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused. 6. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that if applicants surrender before the concerned Court
below within two weeks from today and apply for regular bail, their bail applications shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC
922. 7.
For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them. 8. With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.2.2025 Nitin Verma Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad