ALKA SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.AN ANOTHER
/3846/2025 · 2025-11-28
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174513 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174513 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3846 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant(s) and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.
2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant(s) seeking following main relief(s):-
"Special Judge SC/ST (P.A.) Act, Hardoi in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3023/2025 after summoning the record from the court below and the appellants may be released on Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.815/2021, arising out of N.C.R. No. 71/2017 U/S-323, 504, 506, IPC and section 3(2)(V)a, 3 (1) (da) S.C./S.T. Act, relating to Police Station-Kotwli City, District-Hardoi, in the interest of justice."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submitted that at this stage, he is confining his prayer to seek the benefit of the judgment(s) passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 for which liberty may be given to the appellant(s) and liberty may also be given to the appellant(s) to approach this Court again at appropriate stage for seeking appropriate relief.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant(s).
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
6. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra) , this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today, they would not take any coercive action against the appellant(s) in the aforesaid case. It is made clear that in this regard, no application shall be entertained. November 28, 2025 Arun/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Bhagwati Prasad Nigam, Anurag Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Alka Singh And 3 Others .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.An Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench