MOHD. ANWAR SIDDIQUI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO.
BAIL/5420/2025 · 2025-11-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5420 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Dhananjay Tripathi, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.83 of 2025, under sections 69, 115(2), 352 and 351(2) BNS, P.S. Ghazipur, District Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that around four months ago the victim met the applicant and became friend. Subsequently on false pretext of marriage physical relation was formed. In her statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim admitted that their relationship continued for last four months on alleged false pretext of marriage. 5. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the age of the victim which is around 30 years and the fact that relationship continued for a span of four months, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 19.4.2025 and his criminal history having been explained in the rejoinder Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Kumar Verma, Anil Kumar Tiwari, Ravi Patel Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Anwar Siddiqui .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
affidavit filed today is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Mohd. Anwar Siddiqui be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 5420 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench