H W IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATJ^^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11759 OF 2025 Between: Mosati Seshaiah, S/o. Chegaiah, aged 80 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o. Anasamipalli(V), Renigunta(M),Tirupati District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur. 2. Collector and District Magistrate, Tirupati District at Tirupati. 3. Revenue Divisional Officer, Sri Kalahasthi Division, Tirupati Dist., 4. Tashildar, Renigunta Mandal, Renigunta, Tirupati District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ/Order/ Direction more particularly one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with the possession of enjoyment of the Petitioner over the subject land to an extent of Ac.4-96 cents situated in Sy.No.380 of Annasamipalli(V), Renigunta(M), Tirupati Dist pursuant to DKT No.297/4/1979 dt.06.05.79 and representation dt. 03.02.25 as illegal, arbitraiy, without jurisdiction, violation of natural justice besides violation of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to follow due process of law forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere and Petitioner from the subject: land to an extent of Ac.4-96 cents situated i Sy.No.380 of Annasamipalli(V), Renigunta(M), Tirupati pending disposal of the Writ Petition. may be dispossess the in District forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010237412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) r ' [3329] t f K--a 0^ WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11759/2025 Between: Mosati Seshaiah ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: I.SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11759/2025 0 R D E R: 1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s land admeasuring to an extent of 4.96 cents in Sy.No.380 of Annasmipalli Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupathi District without following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary; consequently, direct the respondents not to interfere with \ the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject land of the petitioner’s. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, without touching the merits of the case, requested this Court to issue a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of the petitioner without following due process of law. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue submits that, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents would follow due process of law and requested to pass appropriate orders. 5. When the petitioner is in settled possession and enjoyment of the property, the petitioner cannot be dispossessed, without following due process of law in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in “Rame Gowda (dead) by L.Rs. V. M.Varadappa Naidu (Dead) by L.Rs.^”. Therefore, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject property, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property of the petitioner, except by due process of law. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of 6. admission with the consent of both the counsel. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. 1 2004(1) see 769 Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE eOPY// SEeTION OFFieER To 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur. The Collector and District Magistrate, Tirupati District at Tirupati. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sri Kalahasthi Division, Tirupati Dist., The Tashildar, Renigunta Mandal, Renigunta, Tirupati District. One CC to Sri Srinivasulu Kurra Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. TF \ HIGH COURT DATE0:07/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.11759 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION, WITHOUT COSTS