PUNAM TEWARI (KM. POONAM TIWARI) v. KAUSHALENDRA PRATAP
/13215/2025 · 2025-11-19
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174496 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174496 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13215 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Preliminary objection filed is taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent has filed an application alongwith an affidavit regarding maintainability of the writ petition and he has submitted that against the judgement and order passed by Small Causes Court, the revision is maintainable under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Courts Act, 1887.
3. After arguing at length, learned counsel counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the applicant wants to withdraw the present application, therefore, the applicant may be permitted to withdraw the present application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file revision.
4. As prayed, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. November 19, 2025 S. Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailendra Misra, Ravindra Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ram Narayan Yadav (Manish Kumar,J.) Punam Tewari (Km. Poonam Tiwari) .....Petitioner(s) Kaushalendra Pratap .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench