SUNIL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
/5516/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174492 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174492 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5516 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected vide order dated
29.04.2022. This is second application for bail of the the accused-applicant seeking enlarging on bail in FIR/Case Crime No.178 of 2019 under sections 302, 307, 120-B IPC, P.S. Raje Sultanpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that two persons came on a motorcycle and the applicant caught the father of the informant and the other co-accused hit him with a firearm injury, which resulted in his death. The applicant is in custody since 04.11.2019 and only two witnesses have been examined so far. The criminal antecedents of the applicant has been explained in the supplementary affidavit.
4. Considering the pre-trial detention undergone by the applicant of more than five years and there being no likelihood of a trial being concluded in the near future, the applicant is entitled for bail. The bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant Sunil Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ravi Prakash Yadav, Sanjay Kumar Yadav Sunil Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 5516 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench