Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174489 (ALL)

MISS. AKANKSHA BHATT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HIGHER EDU. DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10726/2025 · 2025-11-11

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10726 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pankaj Srivastava, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, the learned counsel for Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Awadh University and perused the records. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought a direction for issuance of correct mark sheet showing her correct name as "Akansha Bhatt" in place of "Aknksha Bhatt". 3. On the basis of instructions provided to him, the learned counsel for the University stated that the requisite corrections have already been made in the records of the university and in case the petitioner submits and application and pays the prescribed fee, the corrected mark sheet will be issued to her. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the University. November 11, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Miss. Akanksha Bhatt .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Higher Edu. Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench