Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17448 (JHR)

SANOJ SOREN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5984/2025 · 2025-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2025:JHHC:19801] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5984 of 2025 Sanoj Soren, aged about 19 years, Son of Chhotka Soren, Resident of Village-Hethbandha, P.O.-Goriya, P.S.-Lalmitia, District-Godda, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah , Adv. For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto , Addl. PP. 02 / 17.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Boarijore P.S. Case No. 10/2025, Corresponding to G.R. No. 441/2025, T.R. No. 1973/2025, instituted under Section 96 of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner procured minor victim girl for solemnizing marriage with her. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of the court to para 46 of the case diary, wherein the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 of BNSS has been mentioned, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that therein the victim has categorically stated that the victim was known to the petitioner about one year prior to the occurrence and both of them are friends and their parents were also aware about their friendship and the petitioner has not established physical relationship with her. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 21.03.2025 , as mentioned in para 12 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Godda in connection with Boarijore P.S. Case No. 10/2025, Corresponding to G.R. No. 441/2025, T.R. No. 1973/2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-