Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174457 (ALL)

PRERNA KASAUDHAN v. U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS

/14410/2025 · 2025-12-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14410 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Mahendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the Union of India and Sri Asit Chauturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Dharmendra Kumar Dixit, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 and perused the record. Sri Asit Chauturvedi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the opposite parties has raised a preliminary objection that the present writ petition is not maintainable as the CSIR is notified under section 14 of the The Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, through the notification dated 31-10-1986. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to refute the aforesaid contentions of the learned counsel for the opposite parties. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal with respect to her grievance, if any. December 15, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vineet Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Dharmendra Kumar Dixit (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Prerna Kasaudhan .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Science Technology New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench