RAJU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN.SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT and 6 OTHERS
WRIA/5372/2018 · 2025-11-04
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174451 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174451 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5372 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishun Narain Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ramendra Kumar Misra, Yogendra Nath Yadav (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Raju .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Rural Development And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench