DEEPAK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/462/2025 · 2025-11-26
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174431 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174431 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 462 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Shri Brij Bhushan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, made a statement at bar that the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous as the dispute between the parties has been amicably and genuinely settled and as such the instant writ petition be dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid facts. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 26, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brij Bhushan Singh, Pranjal Apurva, Sandeep Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Deepak And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench