[2025:RJ-JP:20626] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5982/2025 Chandrprakash @ C.P. Son Of Hanuman, Resident Of Bhagwatgarh, Police Station, Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur (Presently Confined To District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Accused/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Amrit Kumar Surolia, Adv. with Mr. Aditya Surolia, Adv. & Mr. Ashish Surolia, Adv. For Respondent : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 15/05/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 21.04.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.313/2025 arising out of FIR No.79/2025, registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66-D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. [2025:RJ-JP:20626] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5982/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant also submits that no other case is pending against the accused-applicant. Learned counsel further submits that the charges levelled against the accused-applicant are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant contends that the main accused-applicant Raj Soyal has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 30.04.2025 (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3730/2025) and case of the present accused-applicant is not distinguishable from him. Learned counsel further contends that since 07.04.2025, the accused-applicant is behind the bars; the charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be granted benefit of bail. 4. Learned Deputy Government Advocate vehemently opposes this bail application and submits that the matter pertains to commission of cyber fraud by the accused-applicant, therefore, the accused-applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the accused-applicant; the charges levelled against the accused-applicant are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class; co-accused Raj Soyal has already been enlarged on bail and also that the trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the [2025:RJ-JP:20626] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5982/2025] case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the applicant. 6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Chandraprakash @ C.P. S/o Hanuman, arrested in connection with FIR No.79/2025, registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The accused-applicant is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-applicant to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, learned Deputy Government Advocate shall be free to move the application against the accused-applicant for cancellation of bail before concerned Magistrate. 9. Copy of this order also be sent to concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /234