MANISH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/11574/2024 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11574 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0174 of 2024 under Sections 191(2), 333, 64(1), 352, 351(2), 131 BNS, Section 67A of IT Act and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Asoha, District- Unnao.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was enticed away by the applicant and physical relations were also being made on the false pretext of marriage for about three months. The similar statement has been given by the victim. The tentative age of the victim is 16 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the fact that physical relations have been formed in between the parties on various occasion coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 07.09.2024 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Manish be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manish .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11574 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench