Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174411 (ALL)

RAM KRIPAL v. SAHAB VARDAN AND 5 OTHERS

A227/6533/2025 · 2025-11-10

Subhash Vidyarthi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6533 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Hari Prakash Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Pradeep Kumar Pandey, the learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Mohan Singh, the leaned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. Keeping in view the nature of relief sought and the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondent Nos.1 to 4 is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Sadar, Faizabad/Ayodhya to decide the Original Suit No.161 of 2009 for permanent injunction expeditiously. 4. The aforesaid suit is pending since the year 2009. The order sheet of the trial Court shows that the matter has repetitively been adjourned for one reason or the other. 5. The petition is disposed off by issuing a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Sadar, Faizabad/Ayodhya to decide the Original Suit No.161 of 2009 expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. November 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Prakash Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ram Kripal .....Petitioner(s) Sahab Vardan And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench