RAM KEWAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/12709/2025 · 2025-10-31
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174396 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174396 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12709 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Saharsh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the material on record. Instant petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to ensure payment of the post death claims like death gratuity, G.P.F. and Group Insurance relating to the late father of the petitioner who died in harness on 12.12.2019 while serving as a class IV employee in the institution controlled and managed by the opposite party no. 5., in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 4 to take a decision on the representation of the petitioner for releasing the post death claims relating to the late father of the petitioner, in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4 within fifteen days and respondent no.4 may be directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4/ District Basic Education Officer, District Sultanpur within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.4 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of two months. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Misra, Mukesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Kewal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 31, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 12709 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench