KAMAL KUMAR v. U.O.I THRU. ITS SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/12836/2025 · 2025-11-04
Shree Prakash Singh
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174391 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174391 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12836 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Dwijendra Mishra,
learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 3, Mr. Anand Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"i-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of Privileged leave enactment along with interest to the petitioner. ii-Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No.3 to decide representation dated 17.05.2025 as annexed as Annexure No.5 to this Writ petition." The contention put forth by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was an employee in ITI Ltd. at Banglore and the place of working was at Banglore plant. He submitted that the petitioner has been retired in year 2022 and thereafter, the petitioner has not been paid the retiral dues and he is running pillar to the post. He also submitted that after the retirement, the petitioner is residing at his permanent place at Mankapur, Gonda, therefore, submission is that the respondent nos. 2 and 4 may be directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner, within stipulated period of time as may be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Dwijendra Mishra Kamal Kumar .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I Thru. Its Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 2 and 4 submitted that since the petitioner has been retired from ITI Banglore, therefore, the whole dues shall be paid by the said head office. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 4/Unit Head(Mankapur) ITI Limited, Gonda,U.P., within the period of 15 days, who after receiving the same shall refer the matter to the respondent no. 3/Additional General Manager/Unit Head Bangalore Plant, within period of further ten days and the opposite party no. 3 shall consider and take a decision on the same within further period of two months. Needless to say that the authority shall also consider the payment of interest on the retiral dues, if so payable. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12836 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench