Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010176812025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4651/2025 SMTI ROHINI BAISHYA W/O- LATE DWARAKESWAR BAISHYA, VILL.- BARMURA, P.O. RANGIA, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781354. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCE DEPARTMENT ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 4:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ASSAM JURIPAR SIXMILE GUWAHATI-37. 5:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 6:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KAMRUP ZILLA PARISHAD AMINGAON P.O. AND DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781031. 7:THE TREASURY OFFICER KAMRUP TREASURY AMINGAON P.O. AMINGAON DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN- 781031 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ISLAM, MS A KHATUN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE,SC, P AND R.D. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 18.08.2025 Heard Mr. M. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A.K. Ghosh, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. S Dutta. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, P&RD and Ms. S Baruah, learned counsel for the respondents No. 5. 2. The prayer in this writ petition is for grant of full pension and other retiral benefits by considering the total length of service reckoned from the date of Initial appointment of the petitioner’s husband in the service of the Panchayat. 3. The petitioner’s husband namely, Late Dwarakeswar Baishya, retired from service on attainting the age of superannuation on 30.06.1997 as Tax Collector of Padumkuwari Gaon Panchayat under the Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Government of Assam. The petitioner was appointed in the service of the Panchayat on 27.01.1957. During the tenure of his service, the State Government had enacted the Assam Panchayat Employees [Provincialisation] Act, 1999 [‘the Act, for short] and as per the provisions of the Act, the provincialised Panchayat employees are to be provided pension and other retirement dues in terms of the provisions of the Page No.# 3/4 Act. The services of the petitioner came to be provincialised accordingly in terms of the provisions of the Act. 4. When a dispute arose as regards the date from which the period of services of the provincialised Panchayat employees was to be counted for the purpose of pension and other retirement dues under the provisions of the Act, litigations ensued. A Division Bench of this Court in a writ appeal, Writ Appeal no. 145/2009 [The State of Assam & another vs. Syed Md. Fazlay Rabbi] and a batch of writ petitions in its common judgment and order dated 24.03.2010 set the issue at rest by holding that the benefits of the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Employees [Provincialisation] Act, 1999 [the Act] including those for pension and other retirement dues would be available to the provincialised employees in service on or after 01.10.1991 on the basis of the length of their services reckoned from the dates of their initial appointments. Special leave petitions, Special Leave to Appeal [Civil] Nos. 19351– 19360/2010 preferred against the common judgment and order dated 24.03.2010 were dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on 02.08.2010. Thereafter, the State Government in the Pension and Public Grievances Department issued a Notification dated 17.03.2011, whereby, it had ordered that the benefits of the provisions of the Assam Panchayat Employees [Provincialisation] Act, 1999 [the Act] including those for pension and other retirement dues applicable to the State Government Employees, would also be available to the provincialised Panchayat Employees who were in service on or after 01.10.1991 on the basis of the length of their service reckoned from the dates of their initial appointments in the service of Panchayats. The said Notification was issued with the concurrence of the Finance Department. 5. The Pension Payment Order being PPO No. ADP/PRI/PPO/GPO/2012/ 000263, issued in respect of petitioner has specifically stated that the date of petitioner’s husband entry in service is 27.01.1957 and his date of retirement is 30.05.1997. The total period of service rendered by the petitioner’s husband was 40 years 5 months and 3 days. Yet, the pension disbursal authority had calculated the petitioner’s monthly pension @ Rs. 1495/- per month with the observation that a period of 18 years .. months and 11 days could not be counted for the purpose of pension and the petitioner’s net qualifying service would be only 21 years 8 months and 27 days. 6. A conjoint reading of the judgment and order dated 24.03.2010 passed in a writ appeal, Writ Appeal no. 145/2009 [The State of Assam & another vs. Syed Md. FazlayRabbi], the Notification dated 17.03.2011, unerringly points out to the position that for the purpose of pension and other retirement dues, the entire period service 40 years 5 months 3 days from the petitioner’s husband’s date of entry in service i.e. 27.01.1957 to till his date of retirement, 30.05.1997 is required to be counted for the purpose of pension and other retirement dues. As such, the decision not to count a period of 18 years .. months 11 days for the purpose of pension and making calculation of the pension amount on that basis is found to be incongruent and Page No.# 4/4 impermissible and accordingly, the same are set aside. 7. As a corollary, the respondent authorities shall now work out the entitlement of the pension and other retirement dues of the petitioner’s husband by counting his total period of service as 40 years 5 months 3 days and issue a fresh Pension Payment Order in supersession of the earlier Pension Payment Order. The entire exercise shall be undertaken and completed within a period of 2 [two] months from the date submission of a certified copy of this order by the petitioner at the office of the respondent no. 4 and the respondent no. 5. In the event such exercise is not completed within a period of 2 [two] months from the said date, the same will carry an interest of 6% per annum. 8. The writ petition stands allowed and disposed of in terms of the above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant