APHC010238282024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1238 OF 2024 Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of Indie, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order dated 30.04.2024 passed in I.A.No.243 of 2024 in O.S.No.11 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge at Parchur, Prakasam District. Between: Shaik Hussain Saheb, S/o.Choudagiri, aged 49 years, Occ; Teacher R/o.Karamchedu Village, Karamchedu (M), Parchur DMC, Prakasam. ...Petitioner/Plaintiff AND Shaik Manolya, Divorced wife of Hussain Saheb, aged 39 years, R/o. 3-23-1, Gonasapudi, Chinnaganjam (M), Bapatla. ...Respondent/Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be % pleased to grant stay the proceedings in O.S.No.11 of 2018 before the Junior Civil Judge Court at Parchur pending disposal of the above Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Pamarthy Rathnakar Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Srinivasa Rao Narra The Court made the following: 1 % ■ APHC010238282024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1238/2024 Between: Shaik Hussain Saheb ...PETITIONER AND Shaik Manolya ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1.SRINIVASA RAO NARRA 2 The Court made the following order: The present revision petition is filed questioning the order dated 30.04.024 passed in I.A.No.243 of 2024 in O.S.No.11/2018, on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Parchur, Prakasam District. 2. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has given up ‘No Objection Vakalat’ in the matter. 3. As it can be seen from the e-courts service of the District Judiciary, the Suit vide O.S.No.11 of 2018, on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Parchur, Prakasam District, was dismissed with costs by judgment dated 20.03.2025. 3. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge (Junior Division), Parchur, Prakasam District. 2. One CC to Sri Pamarthy Rathnakar, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Rao Narra, Advocate [OPUO 4. Three CD Copies BSV sree T HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025 ORDER CRP N0.1238 OF 2024 •y c»> 1 n SEP 2025 X m Os*/ ^ . Currenc Section DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS