Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17438 (JHR)

RAVI PANDEY ALIAS RAVI KUMAR PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3992/2025 · 2025-08-01

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:21521 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3992 of 2025 ----- Ravi Pandey @ Ravi Kumar Pandey, aged about 27 yrs. s/o Shatrudhan Pandey @ Shtrudhan Pandey, r/o village Khirgaon Pandey tola, PS Sadar (Bara Bazar OP), PO & dist. Hazaribagh … Petitioner(s). Versus State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). CORAM :SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailednra Jit, Advocate For the State : Md. Azeemuddin, APP …...... 02 /01.08.2025: This anticipatory bail application has have been filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of sections 482 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioner has been allegedly implicated in connection with Sadar (Bada Bazar O.P) PS case no. 20 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under sections 324(4), 324(5), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 352 of BNS Act, pending in the court of learned CJM, Hazaribag. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 3. The learned APP opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 4. Allegation against the petitioner is that suddenly the petitioner came to the shop of the informant with iron road and assaulted him and abused him with filthy languages and also broken many items of worth Rs.5,00,000/- and also took away Rs.30,000/- cash from the locker of his shop. 5. There is direct allegation against the petitioner of committing the offence which is apparent from the FIR itself and further from the impugned order, I find that there are others cases also pending against this petitioner. Thus, this is not a fit case to grant of anticipatory bail. 6. Hence, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Anjali/-