Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174364 (ALL)

VINAY @ LAMBOO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN SECY. HOME DEPTT. CIVIL SECTT. LKO

BAIL/13359/2024 · 2025-11-06

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13359 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. This is third bail application of the accused-applicant seeking bail in FIR/Case Crime No.029 of 2021 under sections 302, 307, 201 and 328 IPC, P.S. Asoha, District Unnao. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected vide order dated 26.09.2023 and the second bail application of the applicant was rejected on 03.09.2024. 3. While arguing the third bail application, the counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was not named in the FIR. In the FIR, it was alleged that three females were found dead in an agricultural field and it appeared that somebody had killed them. With regard to two of the girls, who died, the cause of death was ascertained as poisoning, as per the viscera report. The third child had stated that the applicant had come on the spot and was given some liquid to take, because of which, they became unconscious and subsequently, two of the girls died. 4. The counsel for the applicant draws my attention to the statement of the said witness examined during trial, wherein she stated that she had narrated the said statement based upon the directions given by the family members. The applicant is in custody since 19.02.2021 and has no Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Kant Dubey, Neeraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinay @ Lamboo .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko .....Opposite Party(s) criminal history. 5. Considering the fact that the main witness has already been examined and the applicant has suffered pretrial detention of almost four years nine months and has no criminal history, he is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vinay @ Lamboo be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 6, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 13359 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench