HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11601 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Ajey Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shir Surendra Kumar Singh, the learned Standing Counsel for State of U.P. and Shri Rama Shankar Tiwari, learned counsel who is putting appearance by producing Vakalatnama executed by one Laxami Pathak stating that Laxami Pathak was a party, in proceeding before the S.D.M. and although she is the necessary party in the writ petition, but she has not been impleaded by the petitioner. 2. Shri Tiwari states that the petition suffers from defects of nonjoinder of necessary a party. 3. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that the petitioner has got a statutory remedy of filing appeal and, therefore, thus the writ petition should not be entertained in view of the availability of efficacious remedy. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioner to file appeal against the impugned order. December 1, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajey Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Bajrang Bali Swayam Sahayata Samooh Thru. Member Smt. Antima Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Food And Civil Supplies Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench