Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174355 (ALL)

BABU AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/2074/2024 · 2025-10-31

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2074 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Heard Sri Furkan Pathan, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners for remission sent by the jail has not been considered in regard to all the petitioners and only petitioners no. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8 have been released on remission but no decision has been taken in regard to petitioners no. 3 and 6 till date. 3. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions, does not dispute the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that decision in respect of remaining petitioners shall be taken expeditiously and within the period provided by this Court. 4. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority to consider the case of petitioners no. 3 and 6 expeditiously, say within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order and pass a reasoned and speaking order within the said period. 5. Consequences to follow accordingly as per law. October 31, 2025 Fahim/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Furkan Pathan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Babu And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench