Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174341 (ALL)

BALWAN SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/13564/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13564 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to reimburse medical claims of petitioner amounting to Rs.1,22,592/- along with interest. 3. Learned State Counsel has not been provided any instructions in the matter. 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. In case petitioner is found entitled for aforesaid benefits, actual payment thereof shall be ensured within a period of two weeks thereafter. The authority concerned shall also consider the aspect of grant of interest on the delayed payment within the said time period. 5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 26, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Singh, Himanshu Deepak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Balwan Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench