2025:HHC:9287 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 3832 of 2024 a/w CWP Nos. 7993 of 2022, 1239 of 2023 & 3541 of 2024 Decided on : 07.04.2025 1. CWP No. 3832 of 2024. Diamond Traexim Private Limited. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents 2. CWP No. 7993 of 2022. Dr. Pawan Kumar Banta. …Petitioner Versus M/s Nirvana Woods & Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and another. …Respondents 3. CWP No. 1239 of 2023. Kyari Grameen Kalyan Sabha. …Petitioner Versus Union of India and others. …Respondents 2 2025:HHC:9287 4. CWP No. 3541 of 2024. Sunil Kumar Sood. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, in CWP No. 3832 of 2021. M/s Adarsh Kumar Vashista and Shivom Vashista, Advocates, in CWP Nos. 7993 of 2022 & 1239 of 2023. Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate, in CWP No. 3541 of 2024. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State, Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.4 and Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.7, in CWP No. 3832 of 2021. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 3 2025:HHC:9287 Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vivek Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.1 and Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.2, in CWP No.7993 of 2022. Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, for respondent No.1, Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State, Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4 and Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.5, in CWP No. 1239 of 2023. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State, Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.8, Mr. Sandeep Dutta, Advocate, for respondent No.9 and Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.10, in CWP No. 3541 of 2024. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties submits that now the issue raised in these writ petitions, stand settled between the parties. 2. Accordingly, these writ petitions are closed as settled. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand 4 2025:HHC:9287 disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 07, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)