Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:12436] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7301/2024
1. Sunita Wife Of Durgalal, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Jatwada Kalan, Gurjar Basti, Sawaimahdopur District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.)
2. Shiv Kumar Sharma Son Of Purushottam Sharma, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of 185, Gram Dhaundha Morena Vihaypur Dhaundha Porena Jaurya (M.p.) At Present 48-B, Shanti Nagar, Gujar Ki Thadi, Masarovar Jaipur.
3. Lakhan Saini Son Of Girdhari Lal Saini, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Sakarva, Goverdhan Brahmnan, Mathura (U.p.)
4. Vishal Yogi Son Of Durgashankar Yogi, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Jatwara Kaln, Swaimadhopur District Swaimadhopur (Raj.)
5. Lehru Lal Jat Son Of Kalu Ram Jat, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 5 Jato Ka Mohalla, Peetha Ka Khera, Bhilwara Ditrict Bhilwara (Raj.)
6. Vishnu Prasad Vaishnav Son Of Rajnesh Vaishanav, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Joonda Junda, Rajsamand District Rajsamand (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Development And Housing And Local Self Government, Sso Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan
2. Jaipur Municipal Corporation (Jmc), Through Its Ceo, Having Office At Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Parisar, Lalkothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan
3. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Commissioner, Having Office At Indra Circle, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Police Commissioner, Commissionerate, Jaipur
5. The Sho, Police Station Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kishan Lal Meena for Dr. Sanjay Tiwari For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 19/03/2025
1. Instant writ petition was filed wayback on 01.05.2024 and thereafter, whenever the same was listed before the Court i.e. on
[2025:RJ-JP:12436] (2 of 2) [CW-7301/2024] 13.05.2024, on 21.05.2024 and then on 11.09.2024, counsel for petitioner did not argue the matter and prayed for adjournment. Today also, a prayer of adjournment has been made on behalf of petitioner.
2. In such view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/51