Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17430 (GAU)

MRINAL SAIKIA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

Crl.Pet./785/2018 · 2025-03-06

Kaushik Goswami

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010176802018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./785/2018 MRINAL SAIKIA S/O SRI JUGAL SAIKIA, R/O SOLENGI, GOHPUR, PS AND MOUZA- GOHPUR, DIST. BISWANATH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP BY PP, ASSAM 2:KUNJA LAHON SAIKIA W/O SRI MRINAL SAIKIA R/O VILLAGE GOROIMARI PS GOHPUR DIST. BISWANATH ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P SUNDI, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/656/2023 KUNJA LAHON SAIKIA W/O SRI MRINAL SAIKIA R/O VILLAGE GOROIMARI PS GOHPUR DIST. BISWANATH Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM. VERSUS MRINAL SAIKIA AND ANR S/O SRI JUGAL SAIKIA R/O SOLENGI GOHPUR PS AND MOUZA- GOHPUR DIST. BISWANATH ASSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for MRINAL SAIKIA AND ANR BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI 07.03.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. Heard Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. It appears that on the last occasions dated 05.03.2023, 15.11.2023 and 18.10.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed today with the remark “For Dismissal” in the Order Column. Today, when the matter has been listed with the remark “For Dismissal” in the cause list, there is still no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 As such, the criminal petition stands closed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant