Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174295 (ALL)

ANUPAM TIWARI @ SATYAM TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAIL/6825/2025 · 2025-10-29

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6825 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 189 of 2025, under Sections 74, 64, 140(4), 127(2), 76 BNS, P.S. PGI, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on the date of incident i.e. 26.4.2025 when the victim was going towards her home a four wheeler stopped and she was made to sit in the vehicle and driver of the vehicle misbehaved with her. No one was named in the FIR. Subsequently in the statement under Section 183 BNS the victim aged about 32 years stated that she was taken on vehicle and was misbehaved and wrong was also committed. The victim refused to undergo medial examination. It is further submitted that the criminal history of the applicant have been duly explained in paragraph 28 of this bail application. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the improbability of statements made and thereafter no material to identify the applicant with the alleged offence, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 28.4.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mayank Sharma, Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anupam Tiwari @ Satyam Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Anupam Tiwari @ Satyam Tiwari be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 6825 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench