VISHAL v. THE NAGAR AYUKT (MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER) NAGAR NIGAM LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/13358/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13358 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Ms. Shruti Sahu learned counsel on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 & 2 is taken on record. Vakalatnama filed by Mr. Krishna Kumar Pandey, learned counsel on behalf of the respondent no.3 is also taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Shruti Sahu learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 & 2 and Mr. Krishna Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"I. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opposite parties to pay the death cum retiral dues namely as amount of provident fund, amount of gratuity, amount of leave encashment, amount of group insurance and other benefits alongwith 12% interest per annum. II. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opposite parties to pay the arrear of difference family pension in terms of 7th pay scale w.e.f. 01-01-2016 up to 15-11-2016. III. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opposite parties to pay the arrear of family pension for the period of three months which was withheld by the Opposite parties. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Namit Sharma, Sanjeev Singh, Shruti Sahu Vishal .....Petitioner(s) The Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner) Nagar Nigam Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
IV. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opposite parties to pay the arrear of family pension from the date of death of mother dated-16- 11-2016 up to completing 25 year age of the petitioner. V. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the Opposite parties to consider and decide the representation-dated-29-08-2025, which is contained as Annexure No. 10 to this writ petition."
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.1 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.1 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.1/ Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam, Lucknow within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.1 is
directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
November 20, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13358 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench