SHYAM NARAYAN v. LD. CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION ) MUSAFIRKHANA SULTANPUR AND 6 OTHERS
A227/6395/2025 · 2025-10-31
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174285 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174285 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6395 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that inadvertently the suit number has incorrectly been mentioned in the prayer. He seeks the leave of the Court to correct the same.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to carry out the necessary correction during the course of the day.
3. Heard Shri Aseem Pandey, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Anjani Kumar Dwivedi for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.
4. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notices to the private-respondents No.2 to 7 are dispensed with.
5. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Regular Suit No.257 of 2023, Ibbar Vs. Shyam Narayan pending before the respondent No.1.
6. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the Regular Suit No.257 of 2023, Ibbar Vs. Shyam Narayan pending Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjani Kumar Dvivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Shyam Narayan .....Petitioner(s) Ld. Civil Judge (Junior Division ) Musafirkhana Sultanpur And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
before the respondent No.1 as expeditiously as possible, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
8. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
9. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 31, 2025 ank A227 No. 6395 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench