[2025:RJ-JP:25800] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2579/2025 1. Kapil Meerchandani S/o Late Kamal Kishore Meerchandani, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No. 1-D- 71, J.n.v. Colony, District Bikaner, At Present Tenant In House No. A-146, Shiv Shakti Nagar, Malviya Nagar, P.s. Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur ). 2. Saurabh Sadargani S/o Shri Rajkumar Sadargani, R/o House No. 3-Na-7, Jawahar Nagar, P.s. Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Vipul Juneja S/o Subhash Juneja, R/o 1/176, Apex Circle, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Indian Bank, Zonal Office, Jagatpura Gatore, Jaipur Through Zonal Head. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.K. Moolchandani with Ms. Anupama Dhawaniya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP, Mr. Bhawani Saini for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 12/07/2025 1. In pursuant to the order dated 11.07.2025, victim Subhash Juneja is present in person before this Court. The victim is represented by the learned counsel Mr. Bhawani Saini. 2. The learned Trial Court vide its order dated 01.04.2025 acquitted the petitioners for the offence under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC and the matter was kept pending for the offence under Section 120-B of IPC. The learned Trial Court acquitted the petitioners for the above mentioned offences after considering the [2025:RJ-JP:25800] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2579/2025] compromise entered between the complainant/victim and the accused. The compromise bear the signature of the victims and complainant Vipul Juneja except the present victim Subhash Juneja. Today, the victim Subhash Juneja is present in person before this Court and has expressed that he does not want to pursue the FIR against the petitioners. 3. Heard and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the fact that the complainant and all other victims have submitted the written compromise before the learned Trial Court and victim Subhash Juneja has also expressed that he does not want to pursue the litigation pending against the petitioners, and taking into account the fact narrated in the FIR, this Court deems it proper to quash the proceedings pending qua the petitioners. 5. The present criminal misc. petition of the petitioners is allowed and criminal proceedings pending qua the petitioners before the learned Trial Court for the offence under Section 120-B of IPC, is hereby quashed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/5