ANIL KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.EDU.GOVT.OF UP CIVIL SECTT.LKO.and ORS
WRIA/11645/2016 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174258 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 174258 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11645 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. consigned to record. November 24, 2025 Arti/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anil Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Edu.Govt.Of Up Civil Sectt.Lko.And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench