Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 174246 (ALL)

YOGESH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/10427/2025 · 2025-11-06

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10427 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and Mohd. Qasim Khan who appears for the informant. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.146 of 2025 under section 64(2)e, 123 BNS, P.S. Pachpedwa, District Balrampur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the informant was suffering from certain ailments and when to visit a doctor, wherein he admitted her and subsequently, the applicant who was working in the hospital administered an injunction because of which she became unconscious and thereafter wrong was committed. A similar statement was given under section 180 and 183 BNSS. The medical of the victim done, did not corroborate any of the allegations. The tentative age of the victim is around 22 years. 4. Considering the nature of the allegation and the medical not corroborating with the same, prima-facie, a case for bail is made out more so when the applicant has no criminal history and is in custody since 27.07.2025. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Yogesh Pandey be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Yogesh Pandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 6, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 10427 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench