MANOHAR MANDAL And ORS v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS
WPC/5510/2011 · 2025-04-23
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17424 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17424 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:12037
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (C) No. 5510 of 2011
-----
1. Manohar Mandal, S/o Late Haru Mandal
2. Kamal Mandal
3. Gopal Mandal
4. Kinkar Mandal, petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 are sons of Late Gobinda Mandal, All R/o Village-Dumarbank, P.O.-Fatehpur, P.S.-Fatehpur, Dist.-Jamtara
… …. Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara, P.O. & P.S.-Jamtara, Dist.- Jamtara
3. The Land Acquisition Officer, Jamtara, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Jamtara
4. The Circle Officer, Fatehpur Block, P.O. & P.S.-Fatehpur, Dist.- Jamtara
5. The Amin, Land Reforms Office, Jamtara, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Jamtara
6. Sarswati Mandalian, D/o Haru Mandal, R/o Village-Birmati, P.O. & P.S.-Deoghar, Dist.-Deoghar
7. Hiralal Mandal, S/o Smt. Gogga Devi and Sadhu Mandal, R/o Village-Bastudih, P.O. & P.S.-Muslia, Dist.-Dumka
…. …. Respondents
----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----- For the Petitioners : None
For the State
: Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, AC to AG For Respondent-6 & 7 : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate
Mr. Siddharth Ranjan, Advocate
Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate
----- Oral Order
14 / Dated : 23.04.2025
None appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for default on account of non-prosecution.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra