GHANTI SINGH ALIAS KARAN SINGH ALIAS KARAN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5914/2025 · 2025-07-16
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17423 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17423 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2025:JHHC:19421] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5914 of 2025
Ghanti Singh @ Karan Singh @ Karan Kumar Singh, Aged about 20 years, S/O- Late Manjit Singh, R/O-Near Jharkhand Complex, Jharia, P.O+ P.S- Jharia, District- Dhanbad.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. P.Lala , Adv. For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak , Addl. PP.
02 / 16.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jharia P.S. Case No. 335 of 2024 instituted under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 118 (2), 117 (2), 118 (1), 109, 352, 3 (5) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Mahesh Kumar Dutta by assaulting him with knife on his eye. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and allegation of assault is upon the co- accused and the only allegation against the petitioner is that he only caught the neck of the victim. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 16 of the bail application and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case and no witness has been examined. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 11.04.2025 , as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application.
It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Dhanbad in connection with Jharia P.S. Case No. 335 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-